Showing posts with label crime. Show all posts
Showing posts with label crime. Show all posts

Thursday, May 17, 2007

Mum's the Word

Given all the crap that's floating around about the NZ police at the moment let me share this little yarn which dates back 20 or so years in the small country town where I grew up.

The local police station had been subject to an arson attack (suspicion being it was lit by the cops who were sick of their ancient poky digs) meaning they were operating out of the old courthouse
building down the road.

However, following the annual cannabis plantation raids, they chose to store their confiscated pile of dope plants in the cell one weekend ahead of impending incineration on a Monday morning.

Lo and behold they turn up on Monday and the plants were gone.

Unfortunately for the enterprising thieves the planst had wilted and were prone to shedding their leaves. The jig was up largely to the early risers of the town who'd spotted a group of young men - young men not noted for their civic duty - industriously sweeping the footpaths at 5.30 in the morning.

The police caught our green fingered friends but charges were never laid.

Basically because the youths were quite happy to tell the local paper exactly what they'd done. Something the local Sergeant preferred to avoid.

So the police got their plants back, the lads got off scot-free and everyone was a winner on the day.

[NB I was not one of the young men]

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

Updating the Legal Lexicon

Recent events suggest it's time to introduce some new phrases into the way we describe criminal cases and those that feature therein. Here are a few suggestions;

"As guilty as Clint"

"A very Brad man"

"She was forcibly Schollumed"

"Having a Haigh old time"

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Political Irony

A rich white man, leader of a predominantly white and middle class political party, extols the dangers of a growing economic underclass in NZ.

Interesting sentiments.

A pity he made it to a room full of white wealthy people who would rather not have anything to do with the poor.

Maybe it would have been better to talk to the economic underclass rather than about them?